Current location:home page > Laws and regulations

Final review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glypho

admin2 weeks ago (05-19)Laws and regulations32
On 19 September 2012, Séralini et al. published online in the scientific journal Food and Chemical T…
On 19 September 2012, Séralini et al. published online in the scientific journal Food and Chemical Toxicology a publication describing a 2-year feeding study in rats investigating the health effects of genetically modified maize NK603 with and without Roundup WeatherMAX® and Roundup® GT Plus alone (both are glyphosate-containing plant protection products). As requested by the European Commission, EFSA reviewed this publication taking into consideration assessments conducted by Member States and any clarification given by the authors. The assessments of Member States and EFSA revealed an overall agreement. The study as reported by Séralini et al. was found to be inadequately designed, analysed and reported. The authors of Séralini et al. provided a limited amount of relevant additional information in their answer to critics published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology. Taking into consideration Member States’ assessments and the authors’ answer to critics, EFSA reaches similar conclusions as in its first Statement (EFSA 2012). The study as described by Séralini et al. does not allow giving weight to their results and conclusions as published. Conclusions cannot be drawn on the difference in tumour incidence between treatment groups on the basis of the design, the analysis and the results as reported. Taking into consideration Member States’ assessments and the authors’ answer to critics, EFSA finds that the study as reported by Séralini et al. is of insufficient scientific quality for safety assessments. EFSA concludes that the currently available evidence does not impact on the ongoing re-evaluation of glyphosate and does not call for the reopening of the safety evaluations of maize NK603 and its related stacks. EFSA’s evaluation of the Séralini et al. article is in keeping with its role to review relevant scientific literature for risk assessment on an ongoing basis to ensure that the advice it provides is up-to-date.

European Food Safety Authority
Type: Statement of EFSA
On request from: European Commission
Question number: EFSA-Q-2012-00842
Approved: 23 November 2012
Published: 28 November 2012
Affiliation: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Related articles

England bans plastic straws and drinks stirrers

Plastic straws and drink stirrers will be banned in England following overwhelming public support af…

Standard Food Descriptions in Australian

The Southern Shark Industry Association (SSIA) made it clear that according to Australian fish namin…

GACC Announcement No. 210 of 2018(Announcement on Requirements for Imported American Rice)

GACC Announcement No. 210 of 2018(Announcement on Requirements for Imported American Rice)

GACC Announcement No. 211, 2018 (Announcement on Inspection and Quarantine Requirements for Imported…

How to Import Food Products without Food Safety National Standards?

Legal provisions Article 93 For imported foods that do not have food safety national standards, the…

Sri Lanka coconut prices plunge 30% - export ban may be lifted

 Sri Lanka's fresh coconuts dropped with an average 30% to 30,793 rupees for 1,000 nuts (€168,-) at…

China:Weekly Review of Food Standards and Regulations(1206-1208)

  China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment solicited opinions on “National food safety…